Last time we looked at Ayala Land, its Installment Contract Receivables (ICRs) problem had gotten worse and not better.
In 2018, things are looking better - much better. A lot of its ICRs were sold off to affiliates like BPI Family Bank and the overall level of ICRs have gone down substantially.
But credit quality remains a problem.
As a percentage of the remaining ICRs, total past due and impaired ICRs has not changed much.
Ayala Land's Real Estate Receivables Problem Has Gotten Worse, Not Better
The Philippine Real Estate Bubble Has Also Burst For... Ayala Land!
Search This Blog
Thursday, November 28, 2019
In 2018, Even Ayala Land Had a Less Than Stellar Year
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
Hong Kong Real Estate Prices Have Budged - But Only A Little - as of 3rd Qtr. 2019
On a monthly basis, Hong Kong Real Estate Prices have started showing some declines. But the declines are minimal. They have not reached correction levels of 10% or more.
But on a year-on-year basis, prices have merely flattened.
And the most expensive class, Class E (>160 sq. m.), has declined the most but have not reached the magnitudes of past declines.
Hong Kong House Prices Haven't Budged - Yet
How low can Hong Kong Property Prices Go? Some Clues from the Not Too Distant Past.
But on a year-on-year basis, prices have merely flattened.
Even by class, prices have flattened.
And the most expensive class, Class E (>160 sq. m.), has declined the most but have not reached the magnitudes of past declines.
Hong Kong House Prices Haven't Budged - Yet
How low can Hong Kong Property Prices Go? Some Clues from the Not Too Distant Past.
Wednesday, November 13, 2019
How Crazy is the Philippine Real Estate Market? Prices have Climbed Almost 50% Since Duterte Took Office!
Philippine house prices have gone parabolic. They have climbed 49.30% since President Duterte took office in the second half of 2016. Year-on-year price increase as of the 3rd Qtr 2019 is an astounding 21.20%. Prices have outpaced inflation by a wide margin, 139.88 percentage points.
How long can this go on? Not long, considering sales volumes dropped by more than 25% in 2018, indicating that more and more people cannot afford the high price levels.
Tuesday, November 5, 2019
The Not So Obvious Real Estate Bubbles
We all know about the high price of real estate in San Francisco and Los Angeles. Both metro areas boast one of the highest Median Home Price to Median Income ratios in the country. In 2018, the ratio for Los Angeles was an eye-watering 9.44 times median income. San Francisco was not too far behind with a ratio of 9.24 times median income. The sheer unaffordability of many homes has spawned a crisis of homelessness in those cities. Even tech workers, whose high wages have pushed up real estate prices in Silicon Valley, are forced to sleep in their cars and vans.
Yet those real estate markets are not technically in a bubble, and their ratios are just a shade over one standard deviation of their historical house price to income ratios. For instance, LA's historical ratio for the past 29 years has been at a lofty 7.11 times income, not too far from the current 9.44 times income. The same holds true for San Francisco. Its historical average is 7.57 versus the current 9.24 times income.
Even the global cities of Miami and New York are well within their historical averages. Miami's affordability ratio for 2018 was 6.06 times income - not far from its historical average of 4.71. New York's affordability ratio for 2018 was 5.25 times income - a shade below its historical average of 5.26 times income.
So where are the bubbilicious markets? Where have home prices strayed very far from their historical affordability ratios? Does Midland, TX come to mind? How about Lubbock, TX? Birmingham, AL? All these places had affordability ratios of less than 4 times income in 2018 - below the US national average of 4.13 times income. But all are solidly in bubble land with affordability ratios more than 2 times their historical averages since 1990.
Midland, TX ratio stood at 3.08 in 2018 - almost three standard deviations away from its historical mean of just 2.33 times income. The probability of the ratio going higher is just 0.17%. Lubbock's ratio of 3.03 times income in 2018 is 2.58 standard deviations away from its historical mean of just 2.59 times income, giving an upside probability of 0.49%. Birmingham, AL's upside is slightly better 0.64% because its 2018 affordability ratio of 3.86 times income is 2.49 standard deviations away from its historical mean of 3.34 times income.
According to data tabulated by Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies, 37 metro areas out of 382 metros are in bubble markets:
None of them, with the exception of San Jose, CA of Silicon Valley, are in obvious real estate bubbles.
Will their affordability ratios normalize or have they reached a permanently higher plateau? Only time will tell. But if they do, the results can be just as catastrophic for the homeowners.
Only three metro areas out of 382 are in a depression. Their affordability ratios in 2018 were way below their historical mean:
Source: State of the Nation's Housing, Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University
Yet those real estate markets are not technically in a bubble, and their ratios are just a shade over one standard deviation of their historical house price to income ratios. For instance, LA's historical ratio for the past 29 years has been at a lofty 7.11 times income, not too far from the current 9.44 times income. The same holds true for San Francisco. Its historical average is 7.57 versus the current 9.24 times income.
Even the global cities of Miami and New York are well within their historical averages. Miami's affordability ratio for 2018 was 6.06 times income - not far from its historical average of 4.71. New York's affordability ratio for 2018 was 5.25 times income - a shade below its historical average of 5.26 times income.
Median House Price to Median Income Ratios | ||||
Metropolitan Area | 2018 | Mean | Std Dev | Z Score |
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA | 9.44 | 7.11 | 2.14 | 1.09 |
San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA | 9.24 | 7.57 | 1.65 | 1.01 |
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL | 6.06 | 4.71 | 1.54 | 0.88 |
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA | 5.25 | 5.26 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
So where are the bubbilicious markets? Where have home prices strayed very far from their historical affordability ratios? Does Midland, TX come to mind? How about Lubbock, TX? Birmingham, AL? All these places had affordability ratios of less than 4 times income in 2018 - below the US national average of 4.13 times income. But all are solidly in bubble land with affordability ratios more than 2 times their historical averages since 1990.
Midland, TX ratio stood at 3.08 in 2018 - almost three standard deviations away from its historical mean of just 2.33 times income. The probability of the ratio going higher is just 0.17%. Lubbock's ratio of 3.03 times income in 2018 is 2.58 standard deviations away from its historical mean of just 2.59 times income, giving an upside probability of 0.49%. Birmingham, AL's upside is slightly better 0.64% because its 2018 affordability ratio of 3.86 times income is 2.49 standard deviations away from its historical mean of 3.34 times income.
According to data tabulated by Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies, 37 metro areas out of 382 metros are in bubble markets:
None of them, with the exception of San Jose, CA of Silicon Valley, are in obvious real estate bubbles.
Will their affordability ratios normalize or have they reached a permanently higher plateau? Only time will tell. But if they do, the results can be just as catastrophic for the homeowners.
Only three metro areas out of 382 are in a depression. Their affordability ratios in 2018 were way below their historical mean:
- Cape Girardeau, MO
- Beckley, WV
- Decatur, IL
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)