Almost all countries discussed in this blog post, with the exception of Thailand, have been experiencing rapid growth in home prices that have outstripped inflation by a wide margin. The gap between home prices and their inflation adjusted levels are at the widest ever, particularly in Singapore and the Philippines.
Singapore
Singapore's home prices slid for a second straight quarter, which, according to Bloomberg, is the longest losing streak in five years. Home prices are still 84% above their year end 2004 levels.
Malaysia
Neighboring Malaysia's House Price Index actually topped out at 135.44% in the second quarter of 2011 and has posted a 3.37% decline since then to 130.87% as of the fourth quarter of 2013. In the first quarter of 2014, home prices rebounded to 133.03%, reducing the decline from the peak to just 1.78%. Home prices are just 33.03% above their year end 2004 levels.
Thailand
In Thailand, which has been experiencing political turmoil for some time, home prices have remained essentially flat since the end of 2004. Home Prices ended 2013 with the index at 100.54%, just 054% higher than the end of 2004, but showing a substantial recovery since the recent low of 74.08% posted in the third quarter of 2009. In the first quarter of 2014, home prices have rebounded to 102.13%, or 2.13% higher than its year-end 2004 levels, way below its expected inflation adjusted levels.
Indonesia
Meanwhile in Indonesia, home prices have showed no signs of slowing down their upward trajectory. In fact, prices seem to have gone parabolic, climbing 4.63% in the last quarter of 2013, from a base of 121.49% as of the third quarter of 2013 to 127.11% as of year end 2013. In the first quarter of 2014, home prices have climbed an additional 2.56% to reach 130.36%. Since the first quarter of 2007, home prices have risen 30.36%. Indonesian Home Prices, like Thailand, have lagged inflation since 2007.
Philippines
Philippine house price index stands at 199.50% at the end of the first quarter 2014 or almost 100.00% above their year-end 2004 levels. Philippine home prices have posted the largest 10 year gains among all the countries considered in this blog post. Like Indonesia, home prices have so far no signs of slowing down their upward trajectory for the foreseeable future. The question is, is this momentum sustainable? Or will the Philippines and Indonesia follow its ASEAN neighbors, Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand, in exhibiting plateauing or declining house prices? That remains to be seen.
Search This Blog
Friday, August 29, 2014
Wednesday, August 13, 2014
Charting the US Jobs Recovery - DelMarva + DC Edition - June 2014
Most media discussions on the US Jobs Recovery focus on just one number - the headline Unemployment Rate. To add color to the first number, financial pundits like to add a second number - the Labor Force Participation Rate. Both are intertwined and affect each other. But in the aftermath of the Great Recession, there is a third, much more meaningful number that is almost never discussed - the Employment to Population Ratio.
Definitions
Now, what are these numbers? Many people will give you a technical description that can be hard to grasp and make your eyes glaze over the minute you hear them. But the reality is simple.
The Unemployment Rate is the percentage of:
PEOPLE WHO WANT A JOB BUT DON'T HAVE ONE (Unemployed)/
LABOR FORCE
The Labor Force is:
PEOPLE WHO WANT AND HAVE JOBS (Employed) + PEOPLE WHO WANT A JOB BUT DON'T HAVE ONE AND ARE LOOKING FOR ONE (Unemployed)
The Labor Force Participation Rate is percentage of:
[PEOPLE WHO WANT AND HAVE JOBS (Employed) + PEOPLE WHO WANT A JOB BUT DON'T HAVE ONE AND ARE LOOKING FOR ONE (Unemployed)]/
WORKING AGE PEOPLE
Working Age People are generally defined as PEOPLE WHO ARE 16 YEARS AND OLDER. In reality, they are:
[PEOPLE WHO WANT AND HAVE JOBS (Employed) + PEOPLE WHO WANT A JOB BUT DON'T HAVE ONE AND ARE LOOKING FOR ONE (Unemployed) + PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT IN THE LABOR FORCE (Not in Labor Force)]
The category PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT IN THE LABOR FORCE includes:
PEOPLE WHO ARE IN THE MILITARY
PEOPLE WHO ARE INSTITUTIONALIZED
PEOPLE WHO ARE STUDENTS
PEOPLE WHO ARE HOMEMAKERS
PEOPLE WHO ARE RETIRED
PEOPLE WHO ARE MARGINALLY ATTACHED TO LABOR FORCE (INCLUDING DISCOURAGED WORKERS)
The Employment to Population Ratio is the percentage of:
PEOPLE WHO WANT AND HAVE JOBS/
WORKING AGE PEOPLE
In other words, PEOPLE WHO WANT AND HAVE JOBS/
[PEOPLE WHO WANT AND HAVE JOBS + PEOPLE WHO WANT A JOB BUT DON'T HAVE ONE AND ARE LOOKING FOR ONE + PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT IN THE LABOR FORCE
How does this work out?
According to this chart from the popular financial blog, Calculated Risk, the US, in May 2014, gained back all the jobs lost since the Great Recession started in November 2007.
But this is deceptive. For one, the working age population of the US grew by 16.156 million people or 6.81% from 2007 to July 2014, while the labor force grew by 2.899 million people or only 1.89% during the same period. The number of employed persons grew by only 305,000 people and unemployed people grew by 2.593 million people or 36.63% during the same period. People Not in the Labor Force grew by 13.258 million or 16.84% during the same period.
Source: bls.gov
For the United States, the headline Unemployment Rate has dropped down significantly, from a peak of 9.9% in 2009 to just 6.2% as of July 2014. The Labor Force Participation Rate continues to drop and is now at 62.9% - levels not seen since the late 1970's when women started entering the workforce in droves. The Employment to Population Ratio has only recovered marginally from its recessionary low of 58.3% to just 59% in July 2014. It is nowhere near its pre-recession average. In other words, job growth has been growing only barely faster than the growth in the working age population.
Definitions
Now, what are these numbers? Many people will give you a technical description that can be hard to grasp and make your eyes glaze over the minute you hear them. But the reality is simple.
The Unemployment Rate is the percentage of:
PEOPLE WHO WANT A JOB BUT DON'T HAVE ONE (Unemployed)/
LABOR FORCE
The Labor Force is:
PEOPLE WHO WANT AND HAVE JOBS (Employed) + PEOPLE WHO WANT A JOB BUT DON'T HAVE ONE AND ARE LOOKING FOR ONE (Unemployed)
The Labor Force Participation Rate is percentage of:
[PEOPLE WHO WANT AND HAVE JOBS (Employed) + PEOPLE WHO WANT A JOB BUT DON'T HAVE ONE AND ARE LOOKING FOR ONE (Unemployed)]/
WORKING AGE PEOPLE
Working Age People are generally defined as PEOPLE WHO ARE 16 YEARS AND OLDER. In reality, they are:
[PEOPLE WHO WANT AND HAVE JOBS (Employed) + PEOPLE WHO WANT A JOB BUT DON'T HAVE ONE AND ARE LOOKING FOR ONE (Unemployed) + PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT IN THE LABOR FORCE (Not in Labor Force)]
The category PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT IN THE LABOR FORCE includes:
PEOPLE WHO ARE IN THE MILITARY
PEOPLE WHO ARE INSTITUTIONALIZED
PEOPLE WHO ARE STUDENTS
PEOPLE WHO ARE HOMEMAKERS
PEOPLE WHO ARE RETIRED
PEOPLE WHO ARE MARGINALLY ATTACHED TO LABOR FORCE (INCLUDING DISCOURAGED WORKERS)
The Employment to Population Ratio is the percentage of:
PEOPLE WHO WANT AND HAVE JOBS/
WORKING AGE PEOPLE
In other words, PEOPLE WHO WANT AND HAVE JOBS/
[PEOPLE WHO WANT AND HAVE JOBS + PEOPLE WHO WANT A JOB BUT DON'T HAVE ONE AND ARE LOOKING FOR ONE + PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT IN THE LABOR FORCE
How does this work out?
According to this chart from the popular financial blog, Calculated Risk, the US, in May 2014, gained back all the jobs lost since the Great Recession started in November 2007.
But this is deceptive. For one, the working age population of the US grew by 16.156 million people or 6.81% from 2007 to July 2014, while the labor force grew by 2.899 million people or only 1.89% during the same period. The number of employed persons grew by only 305,000 people and unemployed people grew by 2.593 million people or 36.63% during the same period. People Not in the Labor Force grew by 13.258 million or 16.84% during the same period.
United States | ||||||||||
Employment Situation | ||||||||||
In Thousand Persons | ||||||||||
2007 to July 2014 | ||||||||||
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | July 2014 | Variance | % Variance | |
Civilian Non Institutional Population | 231,867 | 233,788 | 235,801 | 237,830 | 239,618 | 243,284 | 245,679 | 248,023 | 16,156 | 6.97% |
Labor Force | 153,124 | 154,287 | 154,142 | 153,889 | 153,617 | 154,975 | 155,389 | 156,023 | 2,899 | 1.89% |
Employed | 146,047 | 145,362 | 139,877 | 139,064 | 139,869 | 142,469 | 143,929 | 146,352 | 305 | 0.21% |
Unemployed | 7,078 | 8,924 | 14,265 | 14,825 | 13,747 | 12,506 | 11,460 | 9,671 | 2,593 | 36.63% |
Not in Labor Force | 78,743 | 79,501 | 81,659 | 83,941 | 86,001 | 88,310 | 90,290 | 92,001 | 13,258 | 16.84% |
Source: bls.gov
For the United States, the headline Unemployment Rate has dropped down significantly, from a peak of 9.9% in 2009 to just 6.2% as of July 2014. The Labor Force Participation Rate continues to drop and is now at 62.9% - levels not seen since the late 1970's when women started entering the workforce in droves. The Employment to Population Ratio has only recovered marginally from its recessionary low of 58.3% to just 59% in July 2014. It is nowhere near its pre-recession average. In other words, job growth has been growing only barely faster than the growth in the working age population.
Economists have attributed to this phenomenon to increased retirements among the elderly. But the Bureau of Labor and Statistics itself is projecting large increases in the Labor Force Participation Rate among people aged 65 and older. The reality is fewer people can afford to retire.
Regional Comparison
So how does the DELMARVA + DC Region stack up to the rest of the United States?
Delaware
The state of Delaware is in a funk, employment-wise. Its Labor Force Participation Rate, at 61% as of June 2014, is even lower than the 62.7% Labor Force Participation Rate the state registered in 1976, the earliest available BLS.Gov data. Although its Unemployment Rate has dropped from a peak of 8.0% in 2010, to just 6% as of June 2014, its Employment to Population Ratio, at 57.3% as of June 2014, is still hovering near the bottom at 56.7% in 2013.
Maryland
Like Delaware, Maryland's Labor Force Participation Rate continues to trend lower, hitting 66.6% as of June 2014 - levels not seen since the late 1970s. Its Employment to Population Ratio has yet to bottom out. At 62.7% as of June 2014, it is reaching levels not seen since the early 1980s. Its Unemployment Rate, however, has dropped sharply, from a peak of 7.9% as of 2010 to just 5.8% as of June 2014. As the previous data indicates, much of the drop has come from people dropping out of the labor force altogether.
Virginia
Virginia has seen a sharp uptick in its labor force participation rate, from a post-recessionary bottom of 66.4% in 2013, to 67.2% as of June 2014. Likewise, its Employment to Population Ratio has improved to 63.6% as of June 2014. Unemployment Rate has dropped from its 2010 peak of 7.1% to just 5.3% as of June 2014.
District of Columbia
The District of Columbia's Labor Force Participation bottomed out at 67.8% in 2011, bounced up to the 69.3% level for 2012 and 2013 and is down again to 68.2% as of June 2014. Its Employment to Population Ratio bounded up sharply from a low of 60.9% as of 2011 to 63.5% as of 2013 and now stands at 63.2% as of June 2014. Its Unemployment Rate, which reached a peak of 10.2% as of 2011, now stands at 7.4% as of June 2014.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)