Much
has been written about how CODE-NGO has extracted PHP 1.827 billion
in gross profits from the PEACe Bonds. From this bonanza, the PHP
1.338 billion Peace Foundation was born. Yet there have been hardly
any articles in the mainstream press as to how much profit RCBC,
CODE-NGO's financier, extracted from the transaction. RCBC Capital
did extract a PHP 239 million underwriting commission. But this
amount is peanuts when you consider the fact that RCBC Capital's
parent, namely RCBC itself, risked PHP 11.996 billion or roughly 90%
of its capital to earn a measly PHP 239 million or 1.8% of its
capital. Given that interest rate fluctuations could cause the value
of the PEACe Bonds to decline by PHP 1.275 billion over the course of
a year, this seems foolhardy. Why? Because RCBC's risk was more than
five times the potential reward. If its profits were limited to
underwriting commissions, the transaction's rewards were definitely
not worth the risk.
But
RCBC did make money on the transaction. Lots of money. As much as
PHP 4.0 billion! How? By reselling the PEACe Bonds to institutional
investors at even higher prices.
According
to Jaime “Jimmy” Panganiban, RCBC's Treasurer,
“We
have a contracted sale for PHP 1.2 billion [out of the PHP 35 billion
worth of PEACe Bonds, which is the issue's face value upon maturity],
Panganiban said. But given the publicity about the PEACe Bonds, we're
not aggressively [selling them in the secondary market]. He admitted
that there is demand or keen interest in the bond.1
The
bonds were sold to RCBC's corporate clients outside the Yuchengco
group of companies.2
Mr. Panganiban said that RCBC has been selling the bonds, which RCBC
acquired at an effective cost of 34 centavos per bond unit (PHP 1.00
at maturity in 10 years), for 40 to 45 centavos to undisclosed
corporate buyers.3
This translates to an effective yield to maturity rate (YTM) of
8.170% to 9.370%.
In
terms of profit, this means that RCBC, by selling PHP 1.2 billion or
10% of the PEACe bonds it acquired from CODE-NGO for PHP 11.996
billion, realized a trading gain anywhere from PHP 201.32 million to
PHP 374.94 million from this one transaction alone. If it continued
to sell the rest of its holdings at this price, it would reap an
additional trading gain ranging from PHP 1.812 billion to PHP 3.374
billion, bringing its total potential profit on the entire PEACe to
PHP 2.013 billion to PHP 3.749 billion, just from reselling the PEACe
Bonds. If you add back the underwriting commission, RCBC could have
earned as much as PHP 4.0 billion on the PEACe Bonds.
But
here's the kicker. There could have been even more profits in the
offing for RCBC! Why? Two reasons. Time and Interest Rates. The
prices of zero coupon bonds go up as the bond nears its maturity
date. The closer the bond is to its maturity date, the closer the
zero-coupon bond's value approaches par or face value. Interest
rates also significantly affect the prices of zero-coupon bonds.
The lower the interest rate, the higher the bond price. And interest
rates did go down substantially after the PEACe Bonds transaction.
And as interest rates go down, bond prices go up. So estimating
RCBC's profits are also very dependent on when RCBC sold down
the PEACe Bonds to other institutional investors because the bond's
time to maturity and prevailing interest rates would have changed.
According
to RCBC Treasurer Jimmy Panganiban, RCBC did not aggressively sell
the PEACe Bonds in the secondary market because of the controversy
they generated. Given that they held at least 90% of the bonds in
October 2001, it is safe to assume that all the subsequent PEACe Bond
transactions registered with the Bureau of Treasury's Registry of
Scripless Securities were RCBC's.
Based on this chart from PCIJ's
blog
(http://pcij.org/blog/2011/10/25/vanishing-trade-in-peace-bonds-the-truth-the-banks-the-bir),
it seems that RCBC had rid itself of its entire PEACe Bond inventory
by July 2002. Or given that they recently admitted holding on to PHP
1.4 billion or 4% of the PEACe Bonds, they could have disposed of the
inventory they wanted to dispose a month earlier, or June 2002.
Cumulative | ||
PEACe Bond Sales | PEACe Bond Sales | |
Face Amount | Face Amount | |
Month | (In PHP ) | (In PHP) |
October 2001 | 3,500,000,000 | 3,500,000,000 |
November 2001 | 3,900,000,000 | 7,400,000,000 |
December 2001 | 3,900,000,000 | 11,300,000,000 |
January 2002 | 7,500,000,000 | 18,800,000,000 |
February 2002 | 5,900,000,000 | 24,700,000,000 |
March 2002 | 3,800,000,000 | 28,500,000,000 |
April 2002 | 1,800,000,000 | 30,300,000,000 |
May 2002 | 2,100,000,000 | 32,400,000,000 |
June 2002 | 1,900,000,000 | 34,300,000,000 |
July 2002 | 700,000,000 | 35,000,000,000 |
Jaime
Panganiban, RCBC's Treasurer, said that RCBC sold at least 10% of
their PEACe Bond holdings at YTMs ranging from 8.170% to 9.370% soon
after the PEACe Bond auction, meaning October 2001. If RCBC had sold
the last 90% of their holdings at the upper end of this YTM range,
meaning at 9.370% YTM by October 2001, RCBC would have reaped PHP
2.013 billion in gross profits. But they didn't. Instead, they held
on. Holding on to the bonds proved beneficial to them. The bonds
accrued interest and went up in value. Even if interest rates or
YTMs remained constant, at the 8.170% to 9.370% YTM range, the bonds
would go up in value. By how much?
If YTMs
remained at 9.370% (the upper end of its previous selling range) and
the bonds were fully sold by July 2002, the profit would have been
PHP 2.397 billion or 19.07% higher than the expected profit of PHP
2.013 billion, had the bonds been sold in October 2001 at a 9.370% YTM.
Price to | Cost to | |||
PEACe Bond Sales | Institutional Investor | RCBC | ||
Face Amount | At 9.370% YTM | At 11.000% YTM | RCBC's Profit | |
Month | (In PHP) | (In PHP) | (In PHP) | (In PHP) |
October 2001 | 3,500,000,000 | 1,400,808,914 | 1,199,551,372 | 201,257,542 |
November 2001 | 3,900,000,000 | 1,572,378,050 | 1,336,642,957 | 235,735,093 |
December 2001 | 3,900,000,000 | 1,585,390,220 | 1,336,642,957 | 248,747,263 |
January 2002 | 7,500,000,000 | 3,071,244,165 | 2,570,467,225 | 500,776,940 |
February 2002 | 5,900,000,000 | 2,433,809,634 | 2,022,100,884 | 411,708,750 |
March 2002 | 3,800,000,000 | 1,580,510,528 | 1,302,370,061 | 278,140,467 |
April 2002 | 1,800,000,000 | 754,167,503 | 616,912,134 | 137,255,369 |
May 2002 | 2,100,000,000 | 886,331,364 | 719,730,823 | 166,600,541 |
June 2002 | 1,900,000,000 | 808,555,110 | 651,185,030 | 157,370,080 |
July 2002 | 700,000,000 | 300,078,982 | 239,910,274 | 60,168,708 |
Total | 35,000,000,000 | 14,393,274,470 | 11,995,513,717 | 2,397,760,753 |
If YTMs
remained at 8.170% (the lower end of its previous selling range) and
the bonds were fully sold by July 2002, the profit would have been
PHP 4.096 billion or 9.26% higher than the expected profit of PHP
3.749 billion, had the bonds been sold in October 2001 at a 8.170% YTM.
Price to | Cost to | |||
PEACe Bond Sales | Institutional Investor | RCBC | ||
Face Amount | At 8.170% YTM | At 11.000% YTM | RCBC's Profit | |
Month | (In PHP) | (In PHP) | (In PHP) | (In PHP) |
October 2001 | 3,500,000,000 | 1,571,466,450 | 1,199,551,372 | 371,915,078 |
November 2001 | 3,900,000,000 | 1,762,315,981 | 1,336,642,957 | 425,673,024 |
December 2001 | 3,900,000,000 | 1,775,062,487 | 1,336,642,957 | 438,419,530 |
January 2002 | 7,500,000,000 | 3,435,519,404 | 2,570,467,225 | 865,052,179 |
February 2002 | 5,900,000,000 | 2,719,977,161 | 2,022,100,884 | 697,876,277 |
March 2002 | 3,800,000,000 | 1,764,520,502 | 1,302,370,061 | 462,150,441 |
April 2002 | 1,800,000,000 | 841,197,011 | 616,912,134 | 224,284,877 |
May 2002 | 2,100,000,000 | 987,703,548 | 719,730,823 | 267,972,725 |
June 2002 | 1,900,000,000 | 900,100,051 | 651,185,030 | 248,915,021 |
July 2002 | 700,000,000 | 333,746,968 | 239,910,274 | 93,836,694 |
Total | 35,000,000,000 | 16,091,609,563 | 11,995,513,717 | 4,096,095,846 |
This
profit calculation assumes that interest rates remained constant.
But interest rates didn't remain constant. Instead, to RCBC's great
benefit, they declined.
If the
YTMs at which the PEACe Bonds were sold to investors declined with
interest rates (with a floor of 7% - the yield of reserve eligible
securities at the time of the PEACe bonds auction), RCBC's interest
rate spread would be as follows:
Bureau of Treasury | Institutional Investor | Cost to | ||
YTM | YTM | RCBC | RCBC's Profit | |
Month | (In %) | (In %) | (In %) | (In % Spread) |
October 2001 | 12.750% | 8.170% | 11.000% | 2.830% |
November 2001 | 12.750% | 7.459% | 11.000% | 3.541% |
December 2001 | 12.750% | 7.000% | 11.000% | 4.000% |
January 2002 | 12.750% | 7.000% | 11.000% | 4.000% |
February 2002 | 12.750% | 7.000% | 11.000% | 4.000% |
March 2002 | 12.750% | 7.000% | 11.000% | 4.000% |
April 2002 | 12.750% | 7.000% | 11.000% | 4.000% |
May 2002 | 12.750% | 7.000% | 11.000% | 4.000% |
June 2002 | 12.750% | 7.000% | 11.000% | 4.000% |
July 2002 | 12.750% | 7.000% | 11.000% | 4.000% |
At
these rates, RCBC's profits on the PEACe Bonds could have been as
high as PHP 5.684 billion or 51.61% higher than the PHP 3.749 billion
estimate had the PEACe Bonds been sold in October 2001 at an 8.170%
YTM.
Price to | Cost to | |||
PEACe Bond Sales | Institutional Investor | RCBC | ||
Face Amount | At Fluctuating YTMs | At 11.000% YTM | RCBC's Profit | |
Month | (In PHP) | (In PHP) | (In PHP) | (In PHP) |
October 2001 | 3,500,000,000 | 1,571,466,450 | 1,199,551,372 | 371,915,078 |
November 2001 | 3,900,000,000 | 1,886,177,955 | 1,336,642,957 | 549,534,998 |
December 2001 | 3,900,000,000 | 1,983,066,738 | 1,336,642,957 | 646,423,781 |
January 2002 | 7,500,000,000 | 3,834,638,625 | 2,570,467,225 | 1,264,171,400 |
February 2002 | 5,900,000,000 | 3,033,232,123 | 2,022,100,884 | 1,011,131,239 |
March 2002 | 3,800,000,000 | 1,965,741,899 | 1,302,370,061 | 663,371,838 |
April 2002 | 1,800,000,000 | 936,280,243 | 616,912,134 | 319,368,109 |
May 2002 | 2,100,000,000 | 1,098,355,944 | 719,730,823 | 378,625,121 |
June 2002 | 1,900,000,000 | 999,923,267 | 651,185,030 | 348,738,237 |
July 2002 | 700,000,000 | 370,426,091 | 239,910,274 | 130,515,817 |
Total | 35,000,000,000 | 17,679,309,335 | 11,995,513,717 | 5,683,795,618 |
It's
highly possible that the floor of 7.000%, the current yield for
liquidity reserves at the time of the PEACe Bond auction declined
along with a general decline in interest rates. As such, it's very
possible that RCBC's total gross profit from selling the PEACe Bonds
could be even greater. However, access to that information is not
yet available.
1“Raid
on the Treasury - JPE on the PEACe Bonds Scandal, by Butch Fernandez
and Erik de la Cruz, Reporters, February 13, 2002, Today Newspaper.
2“Internal
Revenue bureau defends tax break for PEACe bonds,” by L.M.
Gallardo with C.E. Yap, February 13, 2002, Businessworld
3“Enrile
sees wholesale ruse in CODE-NGO deal,” by Angie M. Rosales and Jun
Vallacera, February 13, 2002, Daily Tribune